Contributed by Ben Wilson
“Preliminary internal inquiries indicate network protection equipment activated as it is designed,” it said.
“An initial review also indicates that asset and vegetation inspections and maintenance in the vicinity of Reedy Swamp Road are up to date and in accordance with prescribed standards.
At the Garvoc fire, where 18 houses were destroyed along with 52 sheds, and at least 14,000 hectares of land was burnt, the cause was a faulty power pole that snapped during fierce winds.
Brendan Pendergast from M
addens Lawyers in Warrnambool, who is representing a class action being made by residents against Powercor, told the ABC’s Statewide Drive, “This pole has obviously been identified as being structurally compromised.
“It had been patched up by attaching semi-circular sleeves to the pole. So that is sort of a band-aid means of extending the life of the pole.”
Jack Kenna who lives at the Sisters near Terang, said the blaze started on his farm.
“The pole that snapped off was supported by two steel props, so obviously there had been a problem with the pole in the past and I suppose they wanted to get a bit more life out of the pole.”
At Gazette, a bluegum limb in a plantation fell onto power lines. A similar thing happened at t
he Camperdown-Bullen fire, where power lines were brought to the ground. The Terang-Cobden fire was started by power lines clashing in the wind and causing electrical arcs that ignited the surrounding vegetation.
All this points to s systemic failure, providing what appears to be clear cut evidence that the power companies are not spending enough to ensure that power is delivered through Victoria safely. There needs to be an investigation as to why this is the case, and this must lead to decisive action, which will ensure that the infrastructure is up to standard.
Failure that leads to destructive fires is bad enough. But when this comes in tandem with government subsidies, it is even worse. A part of the problem may be the cutting of these subsidies.
To many, there is someth
ing strange about funding the private sector, especially when power bills include an infrastructure fee. Taxpayers are handing over money twice.
There is nothing wrong with cutting the dependence on taxpayer money. The problem is that if the subsidies are cut, this should happen together with measures that ensure the companies use their own money to do the job. The evidence suggests this has not happened, and the bottom line is that, if they cannot do it, they should not be running the system. It should return to public ownership.